What is Miragha Aghayev's FIDE rating?

Miragha Aghayev's FIDE rating is 2413 standard, 2415 rapid, 2351 blitz. Chess Stalker tracks it together with Miragha Aghayev's over-the-board games and opening repertoire.

How many OTB games has Miragha Aghayev played?

The Chess Stalker database holds 400 over-the-board games by Miragha Aghayev (318 classical, 10 rapid, 72 blitz), with 42% wins. The full list, with openings and results, is on Miragha Aghayev's Chess Stalker profile.

How do I prepare against Miragha Aghayev?

Open Miragha Aghayev's free Chess Stalker report: opening repertoire with results per line as White and Black, recurring weaknesses and blunder patterns evaluated with Stockfish, and recent games. Then rehearse against the Twin Bot, which imitates Miragha Aghayev's style, before facing them.

Miragha Aghayev

TitleInternational MasterFederationItalyBorn1993FIDE ID818070

Classical2413

Rapid2415

Blitz2351

Games400

W · D · LWon · Drawn · Lost42 / 32 / 26

Peak2434Sep 2022

Rating history

2320

2360

2400

2440

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Oct 2023Nov 2026

Classical2413Rapid2415Blitz2351no games played

Accuracy by phase

96.6%Opening93.5%Middlegame95.4%Endgame

Clutch factor

Insufficient data

Play style

Elite accuracy: 93.8% average

Solid conversion: 95%

Very consistent (91%)

Very precise: only 0.1 blunders/game

Dominates 1.d4 as

(71% in 51 games)

Vulnerable to 1.d4

(only 48%)

Recent games

Perea Fruet, Lorenzo(2406)

57th Italian Teams Final · 29 Apr 2026

½–½

Beliman, Alexandro(2247)

57th Italian Teams Group A · 28 Apr 2026

½–½

Maglioni, Leonardo(2174)

57th Italian Teams Group A · 27 Apr 2026

1–0

Titze, Leo(2213)

57th Italian Teams Group A · 27 Apr 2026

½–½

Altini, Nicola(2360)

57th Italian Teams Group A · 26 Apr 2026

½–½

Play against Aghayev's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

400 games

Based on 400 games

Openings

Based on player games

No clear weaknesses!

By family

open a family to see its lines

PROTime controls · Years · Events

400 games in scope

LineECOGamesLast playedWins · draws · lossesScorevs 62.9%

B22–B50476m

26%43%31%

46.8%−16.0 pts

C00224y

55%27%18

68.2%+5.3 pts

C23–C461911m

53%26%21%

65.8%—

A45–A501911m

58%37%

76.3%—

B10–B15176m

53%29%18

67.6%—

A00–A04151y

57%21%22%

63.3%—

B00–B06132y

92%8

92.3%—

A10–A30132y

62%1523%

69.2%—

Mistakes

Problematic pieces

Insufficient data

Critical moment

Insufficient data

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Insufficient data

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

Couldn't load this.

Endgame statistics

45 endgames (54.2%) · force Queen vs Pieces (33%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

54.2%

45 / 83

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in Queen vs Pieces: only 33% win rate (6 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

€4.17/mo billed yearly · or €6.99 monthly

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

400 games in scope

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

214 games46%W33%D21%L

214games in this linewon 46%, drew 33%, lost 21%

Move

1. e4

1346m

44%31%25%

60%

1. d4

526m

47%47%

69%

1. c4

132y

62%1523%

69%

1. ♞f3

121y

64%18%18%

67%

1. ♞c3

16y

100%

1. d3

12y

100%

50%

1. b3

12y

100%

Scouting report: Miragha Aghayev (IM, ITA)

Miragha Aghayev

Rating history

Play style

Recent games

Play against Aghayev's Twin

Openings

By family

Mistakes

Critical blunders

Endgame statistics

Repertoire