Scouting report: Atulya Shetty (IM, USA)

540 over-the-board games in the Chess Stalker database (428 classical, 54 rapid, 58 blitz): 38% wins, 30% draws, 31% losses. FIDE rating 2455 standard, 2460 rapid, 2355 blitz. 111 games analyzed with Stockfish: 94% accuracy, 0.03 blunders per game.

Opening repertoire of Atulya Shetty as White and Black, with results per line — free.
Weaknesses and blunder patterns, evaluated with Stockfish — free.
Recent over-the-board games and endgame statistics.
Twin Bot: a sparring bot that imitates Atulya Shetty's style so you can rehearse the matchup — free online.

Full report: https://chessstalker.com/fide/2031213 — no account needed.

Atulya Shetty

TitleInternational MasterFederationUnited StatesBorn1996FIDE ID2031213

Classical2455

Rapid2460

Blitz2355

Games540

W · D · LWon · Drawn · Lost38 / 30 / 31

Peak2467Aug 2021

Rating history

2340

2380

2420

2460

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Oct 2023Nov 2026

Classical2455Rapid2460Blitz2355no games played

Accuracy by phase

95.9%Opening94.0%Middlegame95.1%Endgame

Clutch factor

Insufficient data

Play style

Elite accuracy: 93.5% average

Solid conversion: 93%

Very consistent (92%)

Very precise: only 0.0 blunders/game

Dominates 1.c4 as

(57% in 221 games)

Vulnerable to 1.Nf3

(only 40%)

Recent games

Grutter, Tim(2399)

15th LCC Super Rapid 2025 · 7 Dec 2025

½–½

Noy, Eyal(2275)

15th LCC Super Rapid 2025 · 7 Dec 2025

1–0

McPhillips, Joseph(2388)

15th LCC Super Rapid 2025 · 7 Dec 2025

0–1

Hunt, Harriet V(2288)

15th LCC Super Rapid 2025 · 7 Dec 2025

0–1

Abdusattorov, Nodirbek(2750)

15th LCC Super Rapid 2025 · 7 Dec 2025

0–1

Play against Shetty's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

540 games

Based on 540 games

Openings

266 games as White · scores 54.9%

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White

No significant weaknesses detected as white

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White

No consistent strengths detected as white

By family

open a family to see its lines

PROTime controls · Years · Events

540 games in scope

LineECOGamesLast playedWins · draws · lossesScorevs 54.9%

A10–A3022111m

40%33%27%

56.6%—

A00–A04267y

38%1943%

48.1%−6.8 pts

B30–B50915y

33%22%45%

44.4%—

C70316y

100%

0.0%—

D10–D1138y

33%33%34%

50.0%—

C50115y

100%

100.0%—

B00116y

100%

100.0%—

B12116y

100%

0.0%—

Mistakes

Problematic pieces

Insufficient data

Critical moment

Insufficient data

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Insufficient data

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

Couldn't load this.

Endgame statistics

66 endgames (54.5%) · force Rook vs Rook (36%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

54.5%

66 / 121

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in Rook vs Rook: only 36% win rate (14 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

€4.17/mo billed yearly · or €6.99 monthly

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

540 games in scope

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

266 games39%W31%D30%L

266games in this linewon 39%, drew 31%, lost 30%

Move

1. c4

22111m

40%33%27%

57%

1. ♞f3

207y

35%25%40%

48%

1. e4

1615y

38%1349%

44%

1. c3

324y

33%67%

33%

1. d4

38y

33%33%34%

50%

1. g3

27y

50%50%

50%

1. b3

112y

100%

100%

🍪 Cookies · Chess Stalker stores in your browser only what it needs to work (session and preferences) and measures its audience with its own cookie-free analytics. Analytics are optional.