Scouting report: Vinay Bhat (GM, USA)

902 over-the-board games in the Chess Stalker database (886 classical, 4 rapid, 12 blitz): 44% wins, 27% draws, 28% losses. FIDE rating 2519 standard, 2538 rapid, 2501 blitz. 17 games analyzed with Stockfish: 89% accuracy, 0.24 blunders per game.

  • Opening repertoire of Vinay Bhat as White and Black, with results per line — free.
  • Weaknesses and blunder patterns, evaluated with Stockfish — free.
  • Recent over-the-board games and endgame statistics.
  • Twin Bot: a sparring bot that imitates Vinay Bhat's style so you can rehearse the matchup — free online.

Full report: https://chessstalker.com/fide/2011352 — no account needed.

Vinay Bhat

GM

United Statesborn 1984FIDE ID 2011352

Rating & statistics

FIDE rating lists · Sep 2023 – Sep 2026
2480
2520
2560
2519 · Sep 2023
Oct
2024
Apr
Jul
Oct
2025
Apr
Jul
Oct
2026
Apr
Jul
Oct
Sep 2023Oct 2026
2538
2519
2501
2549peak, Mar 2010
902games
399wins, 44%
247draws, 27%
256losses, 28%

Play style

before facing them
Very high accuracy: 88.7% average
Low resilience (31%): Doesn't save lost positions
Very consistent (88%)
Very precise: only 0.2 blunders/game
Dominates 1.d4 as ♔ (64% in 185 games)

Play against Bhat's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Based on 902 games

Openings

902 games

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White
Sicilian: Closed1.e4 c5 2.♞c3 ♞c642 games, last played 22 years ago40.5%losses
Queen's Indian1.d4 ♞f6 2.c4 e6 3.♞f3 b612 games, last played 8 years ago41.7%losses

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White
Caro-Kann1.e4 c6 2.d4 d515 games, last played 20 years ago73.3%wins
Italian: Two Knights1.e4 e5 2.♞f3 ♞c6 3.♝c4 ♞f610 games, last played 16 years ago60.0%wins

Deep analysis

Stockfish · Classical · 17 analyzed
Accuracy by phase
Opening
95.9%
Middlegame
91.1%
Endgame
93.3%
Clutch factor
+4%
Winning (+2)
92%
Equal
87%
Losing (−2)
88%
Problematic pieces
32%
11 err
18%
6 err
15%
5 err
12%
4 err
12%
4 err
12%
4 err
Critical moment
Move 42 avg
0%
1-15
0%
16-25
33%
26-35
33%
36-45
33%
46+
33% of blunders occur after move 26-35. Keep tension until then.
Error heatmap · Critical squares
4
Few
Many
c5
4
c7
2
f4
2
f8
2
g1
2
c5/c7 concentrate most errors. Force decisions in those zones.

Critical blunders

some recent costly mistakes
Xiong, Jeffery(2672)

Move 41 · Middlegame · OTB · 2019

−3.4f4??
Robson, Ray(2667)

Move 36 · Middlegame · OTB · 2019

−3.3d1??
Shevchenko, Kirill(2539)

Move 32 · Middlegame · OTB · 2019

−7.1c6??
So, Wesley(2765)

Move 55 · Endgame · OTB · 2019

−7.2f7??
Ghosh, Diptayan(2544)

Move 24 · Middlegame · OTB · 2019

−3.4xe4??
Petrosian, Tigran L.(2598)

Move 36 · Middlegame · OTB · 2019

−3.4c2??
Nakamura, Hikaru(2697)

Move 63 · Endgame · OTB · 2008

−3.8b7??

Recent games

Izoria, Zviad(2599)

Mechanics Institute Rapid · 2 May 2019

0–1
Caruana, Fabiano(2816)

Mechanics Institute Rapid · 2 May 2019

0–1
Rensch, Daniel(2402)

Mechanics Institute Rapid · 2 May 2019

0–1
Ismakov, Arthur(2125)

Mechanics Institute Rapid · 2 May 2019

0–1
Xiong, Jeffery(2672)

PRO League Group Stage · 27 Feb 2019

0–1
Nguyen, Emily(2262)

PRO League Group Stage · 27 Feb 2019

1–0

Endgame statistics

Repertoire

PRO
902 games in scope
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1a
b
c
d
e
f
g
h
472 games48%W25%D27%L
Move
1. e4
27811y
49%1932%
58%
1. d4
1857y
46%34%20
64%
1. c4
512y
60%2020
70%
1. ♞f3
312y
33%33%34%
50%
1. d3
120y
100%
100%

🍪 Cookies · Chess Stalker stores in your browser only what it needs to work (session and preferences) and measures its audience with its own cookie-free analytics. Analytics are optional.