Zaltsman, Vitaly

USA USA·Born 1941·FIDE #2000504

2445Classical

—Rapid

—Blitz

Statistics

Total250

Wins68

Draws98

Losses84

27%39%34%

Play Style

before facing themWhat you need to know before facing them

Elite accuracy: 93.2% average

Plays 2.3% better with white

Very consistent (92%)

Very precise: only 0.0 blunders/game

Dominates 1.d4 as

(55% in 40 games)

Vulnerable to 1.e4

(only 38%)

Play against Zaltsman's Twin

Uses their openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Ready to play

250 games analyzed

Deep Analysis

Stockfish 18 · Classical · 7 analyzedStockfish 18 · Classical games · 7 analyzed

Accuracy by phase

Opening

96.3%

Middlegame

96.0%

Endgame

92.5%

Clutch Factor

-7%

Winning (+2)Winning (+2)

85%0g

EqualEqual position

98%2g

Losing (−2)Losing (−2)

92%5g

Accuracy under pressure

Problematic Pieces — which cause most errors?

33%

3 err

33%

3 err

33%

3 err

0 err

Critical Moment

Move 30 avg

1-15

16-25

26-35

36-45

46+

Error Heatmap — where do errors occur?

Few

Many

Errors mapped

Hotspot zone

a6 / e5

Critical squares

2 err

1 err

a6/e5 concentrate most errors. Force decisions in those zones.

Openings

250 gamesBased on 250 player games

Weaknesses

— exploit these— exploit these lines

No significant weaknesses detected as white

asblack75.0%losses

Sicilian: Rossolimo — 1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bb5

8 games · low sample · last played 46 years agoPlay this line

Strengths

— avoid these— avoid these lines

No consistent strengths detected as white

asblack47.1%wins

Queen's Gambit Accepted — 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc417 g17 games · last played 42 years ago

Critical Blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

No blunders recorded

Recent Games

250 games

Draw

Shirazi, Kamran(2390)

? · 1 Jan 1991

½-½

Win

Shipman, Walter(2315)

? · 1 Jan 1991

0-1

Draw

Cooke, Eric

? · 1 Jan 1991

½-½

Win

Hoffmann

? · 1 Jan 1991

1-0

Draw

Reichstein, Boris(2240)

? · 1 Jan 1990

½-½

Draw

Hodgson, J.

? · 1 Jan 1990

½-½

Endgame Statistics

PRO5 endgames (71.4%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

71.4%

5 / 7

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

77.9%353

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

79.4%306

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

73.7%281

Rook vs Rook

72.6%252

Rook vs Two Minors

78.1%160

Pure Pawn

60.6%109

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281

Rook vs Rook72.6%252

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160

Pure Pawn60.6%109

Weak in : only 0% win rate (0 games) — Force thisShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

14 endgame categories — discover where they collapse under pressure

Repertoire

PRO

Move arrowsmost-played moves

Starting Position

SF18

120 games

30%42%28%

Move	games	%
1.d4	84	52%
1.c4	22	52%
1.Nf3	14	43%

MovegamesPerf%

1.d4

52%

1.c4

52%

1.Nf3

43%