What is Michael Wilder's FIDE rating?

Michael Wilder's FIDE rating is 2540 standard. Chess Stalker tracks it together with Michael Wilder's over-the-board games and opening repertoire.

How many OTB games has Michael Wilder played?

The Chess Stalker database holds 360 over-the-board games by Michael Wilder (354 classical, 6 blitz), with 36% wins. The full list, with openings and results, is on Michael Wilder's Chess Stalker profile.

How do I prepare against Michael Wilder?

Open Michael Wilder's free Chess Stalker report: opening repertoire with results per line as White and Black, recurring weaknesses and blunder patterns evaluated with Stockfish, and recent games. Then rehearse against the Twin Bot, which imitates Michael Wilder's style, before facing them.

Michael Wilder

United Statesborn 1962FIDE ID 2000130

Rating & statistics

FIDE rating lists · Sep 2023 – Sep 2026

2520

2560

2540 · Sep 2023

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Sep 2023Oct 2026

2540Classical

2540peak, Jan 2001

360games

129wins, 36%

148draws, 41%

83losses, 23%

Rated gamesInactive · rating frozenOfficial FIDE lists · drag the range below the chartPeak 2540 · Jan 2001

Play style

before facing themWhat you need to know before facing them

Elite accuracy: 92.7% average

Very consistent (91%)

Very precise: only 0.0 blunders/game

Dominates 1.d4 as

(64% in 118 games)

Vulnerable to 1.Nf3

(only 42%)

Play against Wilder's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

360 games

Based on 360 games

Openings

360 gamesBased on 360 player games

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White

No significant weaknesses detected as white

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White

No consistent strengths detected as white

Deep analysis

Stockfish · Classical · 8 analyzedStockfish · Classical games · 8 analyzed

Accuracy by phase

Opening

97.8%

Middlegame

93.1%

Endgame

97.4%

Clutch factor

Winning (+2)Winning (+2)

91%1g

EqualEqual position

96%3g

Losing (−2)Losing (−2)

91%4g

Accuracy under pressure barely drops when losing.

Problematic pieces

43%

3 err

29%

2 err

14%

1 err

14%

1 err

0 err

Critical moment

Move 30 avg

1-15

16-25

26-35

36-45

46+

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Few

Many

7Errors mapped

d5 / e4Hotspot zone

Critical squares

22 err

11 err

d5/e4 concentrate most errors. Force decisions in those zones.

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

No blunders recorded

Recent games

360 games

Arkell, Keith C(2445)

Londen · 1 May 1989

½–½

Hodgson, Julian M(2545)

Londen · 1 May 1989

½–½

Watson, William N(2505)

Londen · 1 May 1989

½–½

Davies, Nigel R(2485)

Londen · 1 May 1989

½–½

King, Daniel J(2500)

Londen · 1 May 1989

½–½

Dorfman, Iossif(2565)

Cannes FRA · 1 Jan 1989

½–½

Endgame statistics

2 endgames (25%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

25%

2 / 8

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in : only 0% win rate (0 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

360 games in scope

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

179 games39%W43%D18%L

179games in this linewon 39%, drew 43%, lost 18%

Move

1. d4

118May 1989

46%36%18%

64%

1. e4

41May 1989

32%46%22%

55%

1. ♞f3

18Mar 1980

1772%11

53%

1. g3

2Jan 1989

100%

50%

Scouting report: Michael Wilder (GM, USA)

Michael Wilder

Rating & statistics

Play style

Play against Wilder's Twin

Openings

Weaknesses

Strengths

Deep analysis

Critical blunders

Recent games

Endgame statistics

Repertoire