Scouting report: Alexander Ipatov (GM, TUR)

640 over-the-board games in the Chess Stalker database (472 classical, 80 rapid, 88 blitz): 43% wins, 38% draws, 19% losses. FIDE rating 2644 standard, 2545 rapid, 2558 blitz, world #74. 48 games analyzed with Stockfish: 94% accuracy, 0.02 blunders per game.

Opening repertoire of Alexander Ipatov as White and Black, with results per line — free.
Weaknesses and blunder patterns, evaluated with Stockfish — free.
Recent over-the-board games and endgame statistics.
Twin Bot: a sparring bot that imitates Alexander Ipatov's style so you can rehearse the matchup — free online.

Full report: https://chessstalker.com/fide/14116731 — no account needed.

Alexander Ipatov

TitleGrandmasterFederationTürkiyeBorn1993FIDE ID14116731

Classical2644

Rapid2545

Blitz2558

Games640

W · D · LWon · Drawn · Lost43 / 38 / 19

Peak2665Feb 2018

Rating history

2520

2560

2600

2640

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Oct 2023Nov 2026

Classical2644Rapid2545Blitz2558no games played

Accuracy by phase

95.4%Opening92.5%Middlegame95.8%Endgame

Clutch factor

Insufficient data

Play style

Elite accuracy: 93.5% average

High resilience (56%): Dangerous even when losing

Solid conversion: 86%

Very consistent (92%)

Very precise: only 0.0 blunders/game

Dominates 1.c4 as

(72% in 54 games)

Recent games

Sindarov, Javokhir(2777)

FIDE World Blitz Team Pool C · 20 Jun 2026

0–1

Petrov,N(2554)

FIDE World Blitz Team Pool C · 20 Jun 2026

½–½

Wan, Yunguo(2503)

FIDE World Blitz Team Pool C · 20 Jun 2026

0–1

Rathanvel, V S(2492)

FIDE World Blitz Team Pool C · 20 Jun 2026

0–1

Hurtado, Felipe(2135)

FIDE World Blitz Team Pool C · 20 Jun 2026

1–0

Play against Ipatov's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

640 games

Based on 640 games

Openings

317 games as White · scores 66.7%

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White

No significant weaknesses detected as white

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White

No consistent strengths detected as white

By family

open a family to see its lines

PROTime controls · Years · Events

640 games in scope

LineECOGamesLast playedWins · draws · lossesScorevs 66.7%

A10–A30544m

57%30%13

72.2%+5.5 pts

D30–D37474m

32%45%23%

54.3%−12.5 pts

D10–D11377y

38%51%11

63.5%−3.2 pts

A01–A04334m

45%45%10

68.2%—

A40–D02274m

52%30%18

66.7%—

E21–E40258y

52%28%20%

66.0%—

A45–E11236y

65%22%13

76.1%+9.4 pts

E60–E70224m

45%32%23%

61.4%−5.4 pts

Mistakes

Problematic pieces

Insufficient data

Critical moment

Insufficient data

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Insufficient data

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

Couldn't load this.

Endgame statistics

51 endgames (54.3%) · force Pure Pawn (0%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

54.3%

51 / 94

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in Pure Pawn: only 0% win rate (5 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

€4.17/mo billed yearly · or €6.99 monthly

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

640 games in scope

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

317 games48%W38%D14%L

317games in this linewon 48%, drew 38%, lost 14%

Move

1. d4

2234m

47%38%15

66%

1. c4

544m

57%30%13

72%

1. ♞f3

264m

54%38%8

73%

1. b3

712y

1471%15

50%

1. e4

711y

1486%

57%

🍪 Cookies · Chess Stalker stores in your browser only what it needs to work (session and preferences) and measures its audience with its own cookie-free analytics. Analytics are optional.