What is Tamaz Gelashvili's FIDE rating?

Tamaz Gelashvili's FIDE rating is 2541 standard, 2627 blitz. Chess Stalker tracks it together with Tamaz Gelashvili's over-the-board games and opening repertoire.

How many OTB games has Tamaz Gelashvili played?

The Chess Stalker database holds 1,380 over-the-board games by Tamaz Gelashvili (1,362 classical, 18 blitz), with 50% wins. The full list, with openings and results, is on Tamaz Gelashvili's Chess Stalker profile.

How do I prepare against Tamaz Gelashvili?

Open Tamaz Gelashvili's free Chess Stalker report: opening repertoire with results per line as White and Black, recurring weaknesses and blunder patterns evaluated with Stockfish, and recent games. Then rehearse against the Twin Bot, which imitates Tamaz Gelashvili's style, before facing them.

Tamaz Gelashvili

Georgiaborn 1978FIDE ID 13600702

Rating & statistics

FIDE rating lists · Sep 2023 – Sep 2026

2520

2560

2600

2640

2541 · Sep 2023

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Sep 2023Oct 2026

2627Blitz

2541Classical

2623peak, Oct 2007

1,380games

692wins, 50%

448draws, 32%

240losses, 17%

Rated gamesInactive · rating frozenOfficial FIDE lists · drag the range below the chartPeak 2623 · Oct 2007

Play style

before facing themWhat you need to know before facing them

Elite accuracy: 93.3% average

Plays 2.4% better with black

Very consistent (92%)

Very precise: only 0.0 blunders/game

Dominates 1.e4 as

(75% in 351 games)

Play against Gelashvili's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

1,380 games

Based on 1,380 games

Openings

1,380 gamesBased on 1,380 player games

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White

No significant weaknesses detected as white

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White

Caro-Kann: Advance1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.e519 games, last played 4 years ago84.2%wins

French Defense1.e4 e6 2.d4 d514 games, last played 9 years ago64.3%wins

Deep analysis

Stockfish · Classical · 9 analyzedStockfish · Classical games · 9 analyzed

Accuracy by phase

Opening

96.5%

Middlegame

94.7%

Endgame

93.8%

Clutch factor

+5%

Winning (+2)Winning (+2)

95%4g

EqualEqual position

95%2g

Losing (−2)Losing (−2)

91%3g

Accuracy under pressure barely drops when losing.

Problematic pieces

33%

2 err

33%

2 err

17%

1 err

17%

1 err

0 err

Critical moment

Move 30 avg

1-15

16-25

26-35

36-45

46+

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Few

Many

6Errors mapped

e3 / e4Hotspot zone

Critical squares

11 err

e3/e4 concentrate most errors. Force decisions in those zones.

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

No blunders recorded

Recent games

1,380 games

Escalona Landi, Samid Eduardo(2191)

44th Olympiad 2022 · 6 Aug 2022

1–0

Ceres, Dragos(2388)

44th Olympiad 2022 · 5 Aug 2022

0–1

Warmerdam, Max(2606)

44th Olympiad 2022 · 3 Aug 2022

1–0

Shankland, Sam(2720)

44th Olympiad 2022 · 31 Jul 2022

0–1

Mendoza, Rodrigo(2215)

WCO · 30 Jul 2022

1–0

Matola Ernest(1964)

44th Olympiad 2022 · 29 Jul 2022

1–0

Endgame statistics

5 endgames (55.6%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

55.6%

5 / 9

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in : only 0% win rate (0 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

1,380 games in scope

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

692 games56%W30%D14%L

692games in this linewon 56%, drew 30%, lost 14%

Move

1. e4

3514y

64%24%12

76%

1. d4

15210y

47%37%16

65%

1. ♞f3

1174y

45%41%14

66%

1. c4

259y

52%36%12

70%

1. g3

1524y

73%20%

83%

1. b3

1519y

47%40%13

67%

1. f4

624y

50%1733%

58%

1. d3

5—

60%40%

80%

1. c3

422y

75%25%

75%

1. a3

218y

50%50%

50%

Scouting report: Tamaz Gelashvili (GM, GEO)