Scouting report: Ashot Parvanyan (IM, GER)

715 over-the-board games in the Chess Stalker database (531 classical, 24 rapid, 160 blitz): 36% wins, 31% draws, 32% losses. FIDE rating 2411 standard, 2314 rapid, 2308 blitz. 303 games analyzed with Stockfish: 93% accuracy, 0.05 blunders per game.

Opening repertoire of Ashot Parvanyan as White and Black, with results per line — free.
Weaknesses and blunder patterns, evaluated with Stockfish — free.
Recent over-the-board games and endgame statistics.
Twin Bot: a sparring bot that imitates Ashot Parvanyan's style so you can rehearse the matchup — free online.

Full report: https://chessstalker.com/fide/13307550 — no account needed.

Ashot Parvanyan

TitleInternational MasterFederationGermanyBorn2001FIDE ID13307550

Classical2411▼ 13

Rapid2314

Blitz2308

Games715

W · D · LWon · Drawn · Lost36 / 31 / 32

Peak2468Nov 2021

Rating history

2250

2350

2450

Oct

2024

Apr

Jul

Oct

2025

Apr

Jul

Oct

2026

Apr

Jul

Oct

Oct 2023Nov 2026

Classical2411Rapid2314Blitz2308no games played

Accuracy by phase

96.3%Opening93.2%Middlegame95.2%Endgame

Clutch factor

Insufficient data

Play style

Elite accuracy: 92.7% average

Very consistent (88%)

Very precise: only 0.1 blunders/game

Dominates 1.Nf3 as

(58% in 259 games)

Vulnerable to 1.Nf3

(only 34%)

Recent games

Sivakumar, Shaaketh(2310)

2nd 3-0 Thursday · 15 Oct 2026

1–0

Pakleza, Zbigniew(2492)

2nd 3-0 Thursday · 15 Oct 2026

1–0

Hengen, Luke O(2083)

2nd 3-0 Thursday · 15 Oct 2026

0–1

Hope,Nathaniel(1964)

2nd 3-0 Thursday · 15 Oct 2026

0–1

Burdalev, Kirill(2313)

2nd 3-0 Thursday · 15 Oct 2026

1–0

Play against Parvanyan's Twin

Their real openings, level & style

Practice against a bot that uses their real openings and playing style

Based on

715 games

Based on 715 games

Openings

352 games as White · scores 57.5%

Weaknesses

where they slip as ♔ White

Sicilian: d6 Systems1.e4 c5 2.♞f3 d618 games, last played 2 months ago44.4%losses

Strengths

what holds up for them as ♔ White

No consistent strengths detected as white

By family

open a family to see its lines

PROTime controls · Years · Events

715 games in scope

LineECOGamesLast playedWins · draws · lossesScorevs 57.5%

A042591w

42%32%26%

58.5%—

B23–B50332w

45%1837%

54.5%—

C41–C44163y

50%25%25%

62.5%—

A46–E1182w

25%25%50%

37.5%—

B10–B1263y

83%17

41.7%—

B0052y

80%20%

80.0%—

A40–D0253w

40%40%20%

60.0%—

C0041w

25%50%25%

50.0%—

Mistakes

Problematic pieces

Insufficient data

Critical moment

Insufficient data

Error heatmap · Critical squaresError heatmap

Insufficient data

Critical blunders

Tactical errors analyzed with Stockfish

Couldn't load this.

Endgame statistics

130 endgames (42.9%) · force Opposite-Color Bishops (0%)

Strongest

79.4%

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

Weakest

60.6%

Pure Pawn

Reaches Endgame

42.9%

130 / 303

B vs N Pref

52.4%·47.8%

prefers the bishop

PiecesTypeWin %games

Rook + Equal Minors

56%44%

77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight

59%41%

79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)

49%50%

73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook

48%50%

72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors

56%44%

78.1%160g

Pure Pawn

36%50%14

60.6%109g

Rook + Equal Minors77.9%353g

R+Bishop vs R+Knight79.4%306g

Rook vs Minor (Exchange)73.7%281g

Rook vs Rook72.6%252g

Rook vs Two Minors78.1%160g

Pure Pawn60.6%109g

Weak in Opposite-Color Bishops: only 0% win rate (5 games). Force this endgameShow all 14 types

Unlock Endgame Statistics

All their endgames: discover where they collapse under pressure

€4.17/mo billed yearly · or €6.99 monthly

Repertoire

PROTime controls · Years · Events

715 games in scope

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1a

b

c

d

e

f

g

h

Explore the repertoireevery move played, ranked by frequency

352 games42%W32%D26%L

352games in this linewon 42%, drew 32%, lost 26%

Move

1. ♞f3

2591w

42%32%26%

59%

1. e4

671w

42%30%28%

57%

1. d4

242w

33%33%34%

50%

1. c4

23w

100%

50%

🍪 Cookies · Chess Stalker stores in your browser only what it needs to work (session and preferences) and measures its audience with its own cookie-free analytics. Analytics are optional.